On 22 Jul 2018 18:47:33 GMT, Savageduck wrote:
> You didnÿt bother to read, and/or understand the OPÿs response to what
> was an obviously sarcastic remark recommending the OP switch to Android. Here
> is what he said, and what you did not appreciate.
Hi Savageduck,
I assume you're an adult, so I assume you can handle facts.
I didn't recommend the OP switch to Android - and I didn't bring up
Android, as you can see from just looking at the facts.
<
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/qvrdDl4NCAAJ>
> "I have a couple of Androids-- but what I'm trying to do here is copy an app
> from/to an iPad. Got any suggestions to do that?¡
Remember Savageduck, before you throw stones at glass houses, remember that
you posted multiple times to that thread (yes, multiple times), where not a
single one of your posts was even remotely close to being on topic to what
the OP asked.
You know that's a fact, Savageduck, because not only do I speak facts, but
I can easily back my statements up (facts are funny that way).
<
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/gPeVojoiCAAJ>
<
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/62UPEo0iCAAJ>
<
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/0quzhQAnCAAJ>
<
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/ooCFANY5CAAJ>
>> and, more to the point, last week I
>> asked a similar question where the answer came back that the only way to do
>> what my question asked, was to use the imaginary iOS functionality that
>> only Jolly Roger and nospam know about.
>
> Irrelevant to the OPÿs issue.
The post I speak of was *extremely* relevant to the OP's issue because the
thread last week proved that the OP couldn't do what he wanted to do, which
was only a tiny subset of what I had wanted to do, with iOS.
If I assume you're an adult, I have to wonder how you don't see that it's
essentially the same question, only for a single app for the OP, whereas it
was for hundreds of apps, for me, and for one ID, whereas for me it was
multiple IDs.
The fact that you can't do it for a single app and ID (which David Empson
confirmed if the app is to be culled from the iPad itself) applies just as
well to the fact that you can't do it for hundreds of apps and multiple
IDs, particularly since the OP is talking about a free app that he received
from the app store that (he says) no longer exists on the app store.
It's a fact that the reason you can't do it for hundreds of apps is the
same reason you can't do it for a single app.
Facts are funny that way. They scale down as well as scaling up.
>> Don't feel too sorry that the OP had to give up using iOS, Savageduck.
>
> You might not have noticed, the OP did not give up using iOS. Since you like
> facts, the fact is he chose to replace the solitair app from the Apple App
> Store.
Don't play silly semantic games with me Savageduck, just because you don't
like facts.
The OP gave up in trying what the OP asked how to do (which both nospam and
Jolly Roger repeatedly assured the OP he could do it, only the OP had to
follow the classic imaginary iOS functionality game in order to do it on
iOS).
So the OP found a *different* app.
In other words, the OP gave up on his original question of saving the
original app, which he had liked.
Now maybe the new app is better, cheaper, faster, more fun, and has fewer
ads and also cures cancer; but the fact that the OP "just gave up" on the
original quest is a fact that you can only play silly games around.
Psychologically, it's interesting that you Apple Apologists always play
these silly games when there is a fact you don't like. As you know, I'm as
old or older than you, with as much experience with computers as you, and
as much experience on the net as you, where I'm on plenty of other
newsgroups.
Only on the Apple newsgroups are these silly childish games so prevalent!
(The Linux newsgroup is almost devoid of them, the Windows group has its
trolls but for the most part, people accept the truth about their platform
of choice, and on Android, most people are factual and realistic).
It's only on the Apple groups that people can't seem to handle facts.
*It's as if your entire belief system is entirely devoid of factual basis.*
>> Besides, maybe you should see the idiotic "advice" the OP posted earlier
>> today to my thread on removing a clutch (which I'm in the middle of at this
>> moment).
>> <
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=1315488bellhousing04.jpg>
>
> Also irrelevant to the iOS issue under discussion in this thread.
It's relevant to my comment that you need not "feel sorry" for the OP.
Here's the OP's EXACT comment to my technical question on another ng:
<
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.home.repair/qEhph1MmSKs/3cNNbzzcAwAJ>
>> All Wade Garrett did was unhelpfully troll my thread,
> The two threads in different NGs are unrelated.
The comment is related to the fact that I was being purposefully helpful to
the OP by telling him the truth, where, in return, the OP trolled my thread
asking for help in removing my transmission.
>> where I'm actually trying to help him in this thread by telling him the facts about what he
>> can and cannot do on iOS instead of providing imaginary iOS functionality.
>
> Actually you are doing nothing of the sort. You are just loud mouthing about
> your perceived virtues of Android. ...and not one word on how he could solve
> his iOS issue.
Savageduck,
You need to act like an adult for at least once in your life.
These are facts:
a. People who told the OP the truth: David Empson, sms, and I
b. People who repeatedly told the OP fabrications: Jolly Roger and nospam
c. People who repeatedly posted *only* unrelated drivel: Savageduck
Those are facts.
>> *There's a good _reason_ he gave up trying on iOS, & it's not my posts.*
>> (You Apple Apologists love to blame everything else for your failures.)
>
> Your posts were of no help.
Savageduck,
I only speak fact.
The fact is that I was the first person to tell the OP the truth.
The fact is that sms was the second person to tell the OP the truth.
The fact is that David Empson told the OP the truth (with great detail).
I suspect the main reason David Empson felt he had to intervene is because
Jolly Roger and nopsam yet again brazenly fabricated imaginary iOS
functionality that the OP said was too complicated to follow fully and that
the OP said failed in what he could follow.
Hence the OP gave up on the original task and found a workaround, which was
to go find another app.
Meanwhile, you posted, I think, four times to that thread (five counting
the one above) where not a single post of yours had *anything* whatsoever
to do with the OP's problem set - and worse - all you did in your fourth
post was complain that the factual posts from me were what caused the OP to
fail, when what caused the OP to fail was the fact that he can't do what he
wants to do on iOS. Period.
*Hence, you blame others for the faults of iOS.*
I think that's fitting since I already said that's a classic psychological
trait of you Apple Apologists.
These are facts.
You may not like that those are facts.
But they are facts nonetheless.
> <<irrelevant blather snipped>>
Please grow up Savageduck.
How old are you? 60? 70? 80?
When will you ever mature?
It's interesting how to spew incorrect statements, and I only speak facts,
and then when I easily refute your incorrect statements (facts are funny
that way), then you childishly call it "irrelevant blather".